Issues
Select Version
U Ñāṇa Sayadaw
English
CC
language.zh-tw
Paṭṭhānuddesa dīpanīpāṭha
Paṭṭhānuddesa dīpanīpāṭha

Āhāra-paccaya: The Relation of Food

Author: U Ñāṇa Sayadaw @ IAPT

  1. Āhāra-paccaya: The Relation of Food

The relation of food is of two kinds: material and immaterial.
Of these, material food connotes the nutritive essence (or what is called edible food),
which again is subdivided into two kinds: internal and external.
All the natural qualities born of the four causes Footnote: The four causes (or origins) are (1) kamma, (2) citta (consciousness), (3) utu (temperature), (4) āhāra (nutriment)., pertaining to those creatures who live on edible food, are here the paccayuppanna-dhamma related to the two kinds of material food.
As to immaterial food, it is of three different kinds: contact, volitional activity of mind, and consciousness.
These kinds of immaterial food, or paccaya-dhamma, are causally related to the co-existent properties, both mental and material,
which are their corresponding paccayuppanna-dhamma.
In what sense is āhāra to be understood?
Āhāra is to be understood in the sense of holding up strongly,
which means causing to exist firmly. That is to say, a relating thing nourishes its related thing so as to enable it to endure long, to develop, to flourish, and to thrive, by means of support.
Though the causal relation of food possesses a producing power, the power of support is predominant here.
Here, the two material foods are called āhāra, because they strongly hold up the group of the internal material qualities born of the four causes, by nourishing them so that they may exist firmly, endure long, and reach uncurtailed the bounds (or limits) of their life-term.
Contact is an āhāra also, because it strongly holds up its co-existent things, and enables them to stand firmly and endure long by nourishing them with the essence extracted from desirable and undesirable objects.
Volitional activity of mind, or (in a word) will, is an āhāra in that it furnishes courage for the execution of deeds, words, and thoughts.
And consciousness is an āhāra also, inasmuch as it predominates in all thinking about an object.
These three immaterial foods, in supplying nourishment to the co-existent mental qualities, also effect the co-existent material qualities.
Āhāra here may also be explained after the Suttanta method.
Just as birds, ascertaining where their quarters are, fly with their wings through the air from tree to tree and from wood to wood, and peck at fruits with their beaks, thus sustaining themselves through their whole life,
so also beings—with the six classes of consciousness, ascertaining objects, with the six kinds of volitional activity of mind, persevering to get something as an object; and with the six kinds of contact, making the essence of objects appear—either enjoy pleasure or suffer pain.
Or, solely with the six classes of consciousness, comprehending objects, they avail themselves of forming or becoming, body and mind.
Or, solely with the contacts, making objects appear in order that feelings may be aroused through the same, they cultivate craving.
Or, committing various kinds of deeds through craving accompanied by volitions, they migrate (so to speak) from existence to existence.
Thus it should be understood how extensive the functioning of the different foods is.
End of the Āhāra-relation.