44.(2)Migasalā
Ce and Be petteyyopi;Ee petteyyo piyo.The only meaning PED assigns petteyya is "showing filial piety toward one's father," which does not fit here.We should probably read here pettapiyo, which PED defines as"father's brother,paternal uncle."In the version at 10:75,Ce has pettā pi yo and Ee pettā piyo,which,by closing the spaces,would both give the desired reading.In MN 89.18,II123,27-124,11,Purāna and Isidatta are said to have been in the employment of King Pasenadi of Kosala but to have shown greater respect toward the Buddha than toward the king.Their love for the Buddha is expressed in SN 55:6,V348-52. Isidatta was not celibate but lived a contented married life.Mp:"Ananda said this because he did not know the reason." Brahmali writes:"I understand Ananda to simply be saying that it should be understood just as the Buddha explained it," and he suggests rendering the sentence:"Just so,sister,as this was declared by the Blessed One."However,at this point the Buddha's pronouncements on their destiny have not yet been explained.The explanation comes only at the end of the sutta,when the Buddha extols the respective strong points of the two deceased lay disciples."[The Blessed One said:]"Who,indeed,is the female lay follower Migasālā,a foolish,incompetent woman with a woman's intellect? Ce ambakapaniria;Be here has ammakasarnā,"a woman's'perception"or"a woman's idea,"but the Be text of 10:75 reads ammakapaina.Ee has anbakasanna.here but ambakapanna in the concluding paragraph.Apparently Ee's former reading is a typographical error for the latter,since on the first occurrences annia is cited as a variant in the notes.Again,the common s/p confusion must lie behind the variants.Ainbaka in Ce and Ee(or Be ammaka)is derived from amina,"mother,"but with the more general meaning of women.Mp-t explains:"Anmaka(orambaka)means women(lit.,the class of mothers).This is a metaphorical term.That is,mothers,the class of mothers,maternal parents,are found among women"(Ammakāti matugamo.Upacāravacananh'etam.Itthisu yadidam amimakā matugāmo janarijanika).SED sv amba has"a mother,good woman (as a title of respect)."And under ambikā:"mother,good woman (as a term of respect)."The Chinese parallel at TI258c8-9,does not include the derogatory generalization about women,but states the matter with reference to Migasala as an individual:"The lay follower Migasalā is foolish and has little wisdom"(鹿住優婆夷愚癡少智)
And who are those [who have]the knowledge of other persons as superior and inferior? The juxtaposition of nominative ke with locative-ñāṇe is puzzling.I take the sense to be that those referred to by ke are established in this knowledge.Perhaps,though,-ñāṇe is a residual eastern form,a nominativeplural in agreement with ke.Mp doesnot attempt to resolve this problem,but when commenting on"in the knowledge of other persons as superior and inferior"(purisapuggalaparopariyaiane),it explains this knowledge as"theknowledge of other persons'superior and inferior faculties by way of their sharpness or dullness"(pzrisapuggalanam tikkha-muduvasena indriyaparopariyaianam).