I.GOTAMĪ
51(1)GotamiThis sutta,the canonical account of the founding of the Bhikkhuni Sangha,has been the subject of extensive scholarly investigations.The narrative also occurs at Vin II 253-56. Several recent studies on the sutta,from a critical perspective,are in Mohr and Tsedrocn 2010.Particularly instructive in this collection is UteHüsken,"The Eight Garudhammas," and Analayo, "Women's Renunciation in Early Buddhism:The Four Assemblies and the Foundation of the Order of Nuns,"which treats the chronological problem at pp.86-90.
This sutta,the canonical account of the founding of the Bhikkhuni Sangha,has been the subject of extensive scholarly investigations.The narrative also occurs at Vin II 253-56. Several recent studies on the sutta,from a critical perspective,are in Mohr and Tsedrocn 2010.Particularly instructive in this collection is UteHüsken,"The Eight Garudhammas," and Analayo, "Women's Renunciation in Early Buddhism:The Four Assemblies and the Foundation of the Order of Nuns,"which treats the chronological problem at pp.86-90.Mp:"Why does he refuse her?Isn't it the case that all Buddhas have four assemblies?This,is true,but he refuses her with the thought that if women are given permission to go forth only after they have made repeated efforts,they will maintain their ordination and revere it,recollecting how difficult it was to obtain the going forth.""If,Ananda,Mahāpajāpati Gotamī accepts eight principles of respect;Attha garudhamme.The term garudharmma is ambiguous.The word garu normally means"heavy,weighty,grave,"as for example in the expression garukā apatti,a grave or major offense.But garumkaroti,lit.,"to make weighty,"means"to respect,"and garukata," respected." Thus garudhamma can mean either a"heavy,grave rule"or"a rule to be respected,a principle of respect."Mp endorses the second interpretation:"The garudhammas are principles that are to be treated with respect by the bhikkhunis who accept them."The translators of the Vinaya into Chinese also lean toward this interpretation.Thus in the corresponding passage in the Sarvāstivada Vinaya(at T XXIII345b29-C33)they are referred to as八敬法,"eight principles of respect."The MūlasarvāstivadaVinaya(for instance atTXXIV350c29)calls them八尊敬法,"eight principles of honor and respect."But the Dharmaguptaka Viraya (at TXXII 923a27and elsewhere)designates them八盡形夀不可
過法,"eight principles not to be transgressed throughout life,"which corresponds to the Pali yavajivar anatikkamaniyo.And the
Mahisasaka Vinaya (at TxXII 185c19)likewise calls them八不可
越法,"eight principles not to be violated.`
let that itself be her full ordination. It is interesting to note how the subject of the discussion shifts almost imperceptibly from the going forth (pabbajjā)of women to their full ordination(upasampada).The former refers simply to their leaving the household life,the latter to a formal act of admission into the Sangha.
Mahāpajapatī later asked the Buddha to permit bhikkhus and bhikkhunis to pay homage to one another(and show other signs of respect)exclusively on the basis of seniority,without distinction of gender.The Buddha refused and issued a rule:"Bhikkhus Should not pay homage to women,stand up for them,salute them reverentially,or behave respectfully toward them.One who does so commits an offense of wrong doing"(na bhikkhave matugamassa ubhivadanam paccutthanam anjalikammaim sāmicikammam katabbam; yo kareyya apatti dukkatassa).The incident is at Vin II257-58.This refers to the three months' fixed residence during the rainy season.Thus on the uposatha day a bhikkhu is assigned the task of giving the bhikkhunis an exhortation(ovada).See Thānissaro 2007b: 446-47.[277]The"invitation"(pavarana)is a ceremony held on the last day of the rains residence at which all the Sangha members in order of seniority ask the others to point out any fault they may have committed,whether seen,heard about,or suspected.Each bhikkhu extends the invitation to all the other bhikkhus.By this rule, however,bhikkhunis are obliged to invite correction from both the bhikkhus and the other bhikkhunis.See Thānissaro 2007b: 447-48.The penalty period(manatta)is imposed on a monastic guilty of a sanghadisesa offense.During this period,the offending bhikkhu must undergo penalization for a period of six days;each day he must also inform all his fellow bhikkhus of his transgression,a humiliating experience.In the case of bhikkhunis,however,the penalty period lasts two weeks and must be observed in relation to both bhikkhus and bhikkhunis.For details,see Thānissaro 2007b:358-73.In this rule,the word garudhamma has a different meaning from its use in relation to the eight principles as a set. Here,Mp glosses it as garukam sanghadisesapattim,that is,it is the breach of a sanghedisesa rule.Hüskin(in Mohr and Tsedroen 2010,p.144)conflates the two senses of the term and thus sees an inconsistency here where there is really none.Aprobationer(sikkhamana)is a woman candidate for full ordination who has already gone forth.To complete the requirements for ordination,she is obliged to live for two years observing a special training in regard to six rules(cha dhamma).The six rules—specified at Vin IV319,24-29 in connection with Bhikkhuni Pacittiya63—involve observing without transgression the precepts of abstinence from killing any living being,taking what is not given,sexual activity,false speech,intoxicants,and eating at an improper time(between midday and the following daybreak). Breach of any of these rules presumably requires the candidate to revert to the beginning of her two years' training.In the Vibhanga section of the Vinaya Pitaka,the rules of the Bhikkhunī Patimokkha are shown to have been laid down in response to specific incidents of misbehavior on the part of a certain bhikkhunī (or group of bhikkhunis).Several of these rules are already included among the garudhammas.Thus garudhammas 2,3,4,and 7 correspond to Bhikkhuni Pacittiyas 56,59,57,and 52.Garudhamma 6 has counterparts in Bhikkhunī Pacittiyas 63 and 64.The fact that the background stories to these rules show them originating at different points in the early history of the Bhikkhunī Sangha casts doubt on the historicity of the present account,which shows the eight garudhammas being laid down at the very beginning of the Bhikkhuni Sangha.If the eight garudhammas had been laid down at the birth of the Bhikkhuni Sangha,they would have already been in force and there would have been no need for the Buddha to issue rules to prohibit the same undesirable behavior.He could simply have pointed to the existing rule.The fact that he did issue new rules thus collides with the thesis that the eight garudhammas were laid down at the very start of the Bhikkhuni Sangha.For atimuttaka,DOP gives"a kind of shrub(perhaps Ougeinia oojeinensis);its flower."Rather than use an obscure Pali or Latin term,I freely render the name of the flower as"lilies."she or he would accept it with both hands and place it on top of her or his head.Assuming the historical authenticity of this passage,if the Buddha had wished to proscribe the ordination of women,it seems he would likely have pointed out this danger to Ananda at the beginning of their conversation.Ananda would then have desisted from his effort and women would not have received the right to ordain.Setatthika rogajati nipatati.Mp:"A kind of insect pierces the stalk and enters the middle of the reed.When the stalk is pierced,the sap comes out and cannot reach the top of the paddy plant."that field of hill rice does not last long,52(2)Exhortation
53(3)Brief
Also at Vin IⅡ258-59.The sutta mirrors 7:83.
54(4)Dīghajānu
Ce and Ee udumbarakhadikam va;Be udumbarakhadivayam.The intended meaning is obscure.Mp explains:"One wishing to eat figs might shake a ripe fig tree and with one effort knock down many fruits.He would eat the ripe fruits and depart,leaving behind the rest;just so,one who spends the greater part of his earnings enjoys his wealth by dissipating it,so it is said:'This clansman eats his wealth just like an eater of figs.'"A Chinese parallel,SA91(TI23a22-C17),reads atTII23b17:人皆名為優层钵果, 無有種子。愚凝食欲。不顧其後;"Everyone calls him a fig without seeds.The foolish man,a prey to craving,does not consider those who come after." Ce and Ee ajaddhumarikam;Be ajetthamaranam.DOP relates the compound to Skt jagdhva,"having eaten,"and defines ajaddhumarika as"death by starvation."See PED sv jaddhu,said to occur only as negative ajaddhu,"not eating,abstaining from food."Mp(Ce) glosses with anathamaranam,"death without a protector,"Mp(Be) anayakamaranam,"death without a leader."It Seems Mp(Ce) is glossing the reading found in Be.The Chinese at TIⅡ23b19-20 has傍人皆言是愚癡人如餓死狗,“Other people will all say that foolish man is like a dog starving to death."Akkhata saccanamena.The one"truly named"is the Buddha,since the name"Buddha"corresponds to his real stature as an enlightened one.See too p.1757,note 1320. to lead to happiness in both states:55(5)Ujjaya
56(6)Perill
An expanded parallel of 6:23.The additional designations for sensual pleasures are "dart" (salla) and "womb" (gabbha). The verses differ from those at 6:23.The whole sutta,with verses,is cited at Nidd II62,29-38(VRI ed.240).
57(7)Worthy of Offerings(1)
58(8)Wortlry of Offerings(2)
59(9)Eiglit Persons(1)·
Karotam opadhikam purinam.The word opadhikam means that the merit ripens in upadhi,a future acquisition of the five aggregates, and that the deed conduces to well-being in the round of rebirths rather than to liberation.what is given to the Sangha bears great fruit.