IV.MINDFULNESS
81(1)Mindfulness
An expanded parallel of 5:24,6:50,and 7:65.
82(2)Puṇṇiya
83(3)Rooted
Brahmali(in a private comununication)offers a fine explanation of this cryptic sutta:"I understand sabbe dhamma to be a reference to the world of personal experience.The meaning would then be as follows:All elements of our experience are rooted in desire(chandamalaka)in the sense that we exist due to desire (taking chanda as equivalent to craving).They come into being through attention(manasikarasainbhava)in the sense that we only experience what we attend to.They originate from contact (phassasamudaya)because without contact we don't experience anything at all.They corverge upon feeling(vedanasanosarana)in the sense that feeling is the most important aspect of our experience,the basic motivating factor in everything we do.They are headed by concentration(samadhippamukha)in the sense that concentration is a controlling faculty (an indriya)whose lead all elements of our experience must follow.They are under the authority of mindfulness(sataidhipateyyā)because mindfulness is another controlling faculty which directs us in whatever we do. or experience.All things have wisdom as supervisor(paniuttara) because wisdom is the chief of the controlling faculties;wisdom, more than anything else,controls our experience(the last three factors are what allow us to get a sense of being in charge of our lives).That liberation is their core(vimuttisara),the most excellent of all things,is self-explanatory."
"If you are asked these questions,it is in such a way that you should answer those wanderers of other sects."84(4)A Thief
Mp clarifies some of these points.(1)An unskilled thief attacks Those who should not be attacked,such as old people,children, and virtuous people who are not his enemies and who don't attack him.(2)A skillful thief should take only half of what is available;for example,if there are two articles of clothing he should take only one;of portions of food,he should take one for himself and leave the other (he can take the superior item for himself).(7)An unskilled thief commits theft in a nearby village,town,or city.(8)An unskilled thief does not purify the path to the other world by"depositing"a portion of his spoils in Gifts to those"worthy of offerings"(yam laddham,tamdakkhineyye nidahitum cheko na hoti,paralokamaggam na sodheti).Presumably a skillful thief will"deposit"part of his plunder by offering it to worthy monks and thereby"purify the path to the other world."85(5)Designations
The verse as preserved seems incomplete because the relative clauses beginning with yam are not explicitly completed by a demonstrative clause.I thus follow Vanarata's suggestion that an implicit demonstrative corresponding to anuttaran pattabbani should be read into the concluding verse.It seems that vijitasangamo refers precisely to this,and I have thus added "overthat"in brackets.by a brahmin who has lived the spiritual life,86(6)NāgitaThe opening framework of this sutta is the same as that of 5:30 and 6:42 but the content of the discourse partly differs.
The opening framework of this sutta is the same as that of 5:30 and 6:42 but the content of the discourse partly differs.In what follows,factors SS4-7 are identical with SS1-4 of 6:42. In Ce and Ee,SS5-6 of 6:42 are excluded from this sutta,but the last sentence of 6:42,not a numerical factor there,here becomes S8.Be includes SS5-6 of 6:42,which then become SS8-9.The final sentence of the sutta would then either be unnumbered or counted as S10. If Be is followed,it is hard to account for this sutta being in the Eights rather than in the Nines or Tens.SS1-3 of the present sutta have no counterparts in the previous versions. Brahmali suggests numbering the sentence that begins"Even some deities".as S1 and treating the final sentence of the sutta as unnumbered,which would be consistent with 6:42.However,I here follow the numbering of Ce,my primary source text.Nagita,you come together and meet,intent on companionship,it occurs to me:The Ce reading here agrees more closely with the Be reading of 6:42 than with the Ce reading of the latter.But here Ce has the verb paccessati,"to return"(absent in Ce 6:42),whereas in both suttas Be has upatthahissati,"will serve."Ee's saccessati is likely to be a misreading of paccessati.This version has no mention of sahadhammika,a co-religionist,as in 6:42.[344]87(7)Almsbowl
Pattam nikkujjeyya.The procedures of overturning the almsbowl and turning it upright are authorized at Vin Ⅱ124-27.See Thānissaro 2007b:411-12.Mp:"May overturn the almsbowl on him: They do not actually turn the almsbowl upside down in front of him,but they enact the motion of overturning the almsbowl, which means that they do not accept gifts from this person.Similarly,they might decide to abolish this act by enacting a motion to turn the bowl upright(ukkujjeyya),which entitles them to receive his gifts again."This procedure was used in Burma during the tumultuous period of late 2007 when the monks decided that the behavior of the military junta toward the Sangha merited such a penalty.The monks walked down the streets with their bowls actually turned upside down to express disapproval of the rulers' actions.88(8)Lack of Confidence
Appasada.Mp:"When this has been proclaimed,they need not rise up from their seat for him,or pay homage to him,or go out to meet him,or give him gifts."89(9)Reconciliation
90(10)Behavior
"Bhikkhus,a bhikkhu charged with aggravated misconductTassapapiyasikakamma.The grounds for this penalty are discussed at Vin II85-86.See,too,Thānissaro2007a:549-51,where it is rendered "further-punishment transaction."According to the origin story,this penalty is imposed on a bhikkhu who speaks evasively or reacts aggressively when charged with a grave offense(an offense of the sanghadisesa class)and then admits to it only under pressure.should behave rightly with respect to eight principles.
(1)He should not give full ordination;(2)he should not give dependence; See pp.1732-33,note 1085.(3)he should not have a novice attend upon him;
(4)he should not accept an agreement to serve as an exhorter of bhikkhunis;(5)even if he is agreed upon,he should not exhort bhikkhunis;(6)he should not accept any agreement [to serve asan officer] in the Sangha;(7)he should not be placed in any chief position;(8)he should not give rehabilitation [in a case]with that root. Na ca tena mulena outthapetabbo.Mp says:"He does not get to do an act of rehabilitation [in a case]that takes that root"(tammulamt katvā abbhanakammami katum na labhati).The exact meaning is unclear.I follow Brahmali's suggestion that mula here is "the root offense,"that is,the original offense that led to the formal charge of aggravated misconduct.